Severe peformance issue during major network outage
Ton Voon
ton.voon at altinity.com
Fri May 11 22:03:21 CEST 2007
On 11 May 2007, at 20:25, Aidan Anderson wrote:
> First of all, thank-you for the replies!
>
> The majority of devices that I monitor are routers/vpn devices and I
> have (on the documentation's advice) not set active checks on the
> hosts
> and instead I've added check_ping as a service on each of these
> hosts to
> do 5 pings as follows:
>
> check_ping -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -w $ARG1$ -c $ARG2$ -p 5
>
> For the host check I already use as you suggested a check_ping that
> only
> does one ping as follows:
>
> check_ping -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -w 3000.0,80% -c 5000.0,100% -p 1
>
> My understanding was that if the service check failed it would then
> abandon the service check altogether and move onto the host check
> which
> is only 1 ping. The fact that the service checks are parallelised
> should mean that it shouldn't matter that there are 5 pings and the
> host
> check is only 1 ping which should resolve the bottleneck of serialised
> host checks. I'm at a loss as to why performance has been impacted so
> severely.
>
> Maybe I need to abandon the service checks altogether and just have a
> host check. I'm reluctant to do this because I get very useful
> information from 5 pings, ie packet loss and high rta which is
> particularly handy for checking volatile links such as ADSL. Maybe
> that
> is the trade-off, fast host checking with no useful stats or slow host
> checking with useful stats.
Just noticed this in your original email:
Host Check Execution Time: 0.03 / 10.04 / 0.843 sec
This means that some of your host checks are taking 10 seconds, which
is, funnily enough, the timeout period for check_ping. So the -p 1
will still take 10 seconds if the routers are not responding.
You can use a timeout flag for check_ping (but is only supported on
some OSes). I guess check_icmp is a better bet here.
Ton
http://www.altinity.com
T: +44 (0)870 787 9243
F: +44 (0)845 280 1725
Skype: tonvoon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list