putting limits on check_by_ssh
Patrick Morris
patrick.morris at hp.com
Sat Nov 17 05:03:06 CET 2007
In my case, check_by_ssh was just not suitable due to overhead, execution
time, etc... NRPE is much more lightweight, easily deployable, and it
works.
I can't say I'd agree with your pros and cons much -- after all, SSH is
much easier to configure than NRPE is. But when you're looking at
thousands of checks across thousands of hosts, processor overhead really
does become a factor, especially on the Nagios box(es).
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Dave wrote:
> My problems with NRPE are:
>
> 1) I know nothing about it.
> 2) I think it requires me to open up another port on my machine.
>
> My problems with SSH are:
> 1) configuration is a bit tedious
>
> My positives for SSH are:
> 1) It is very well known and respected
> 2) Lots of people use it for lots of things, not just nagios
>
> My positives for NRPE are;
> 1) ????
>
> I was hoping you guys would tell me what helped you decide to go with
> NRPE. I just don't know much about it. Since I feel fairly confident
> that I could seal up an SSH configuration, but NRPE is an unknown
> factor for me, it is very tempting to stick with SSH.
> Thanks,
> Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list