Issue with Contacts and Notifications

[Jay R. Ashworth]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:26:03AM -0500, Marc Powell wrote:
> It sure sounds like you're not editing what you think you're editing
> (i.e. that template isn't used by nagios or the services you think
> you're changing). Please provide specific details or we're just going to
> be guessing randomly.
> 
> Template definition
> Service definition
> Contactgroup definition
> Contact definition
> Nagios.cfg line where templates.cfg is included as a cfg_file.
> 'pwd; ls -l templates.cfg' in the directory it lives in.
> 'ps -efwww | grep nagios' output (or whatever ps variant your system
> uses)

Is there a verbose version of checkconfig that will tell you what
Nagios *thinks you told it to do*?  (IE: not just that it's happy with
the config)

Cheers,
-- jra

[ And, an aside, Marc: I want to apologize to you.  You RTFMd someone
pretty hard my first week here, and I was a bit snotty to you; clearly
it wasn't justified. --j ]
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                   Baylink                      jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com                     '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274

	     Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
	     Those who count the vote decide everything.
	       -- (Joseph Stalin)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null