Nagios 3.0.5 on Fedora Core 9

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:

> If I was to go the CentOS route, would the Quick Install procedure available for
> Fedora also work for version 5.2 64-bit of CentOS?

I am not familiar with that. But with Centos it is like:
 - Install Centos
 - Add rpmforge as repository
 - Install nagios through yum
 - Configure Nagios

The last line is the hardest part as it requires one to read the Nagios
manual to understand the Nagios config files.

But I actually have one Centos 4 and one Centos 5 server operational.
And some custome checking to do a SMTP loopback check to see if a chain
of anti-spam and anti-malware servers is working as it should be.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

Nid wyf yn y swyddfa ar hyn o bryd. Anfonwch unrhyw waith i'w gyfieithu.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJG0kkBvzDRVjxmYERAuCYAJwIb80OrUMJLjj2r1Kve9QAlTECCwCfZTRj
FaUiSjx420xhKUOyq6pfUmc=
=2QW+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null