Nagios and Cacti
Daniel Emmanuel Feinsmith
daniel at danielemmanuelfeinsmith.com
Wed Apr 8 17:52:07 CEST 2009
It depends on the intensity of your snmp usage. Cacti has a native
daemon to do large scale snmp getting, and it does a great job of it.
So if u have hundreds of devices, each with a lot of interfaces, u
will probably like cacti. The user interface is also well done for
graphing snmp data and thresholding on it using the threshold plugin.
=====================
Daniel Feinsmith
=====================
{sent from iPhone}
On Apr 8, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Christopher McAtackney
<cristoir at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/8 Andrew Davis <nccomp at gmail.com>:
>> And just an FYI from my own experience... putting Nagios & Cacti on
>> the same
>> server has been somewhat problematic for us. We have over 400 network
>> devices between switches, routers, WAPs, etc. We also have about 300
>> monitored servers. Initially I had Nagios and Cacti both on one
>> server with
>> Cacti running via cron every 5 minutes. About every 5 minutes, my
>> shells
>> would become unresponsive for roughly 30 to 90 seconds. Turning off
>> either
>> Nagios or Cacti resolved the issue. Running both seems to have
>> hammered the
>> server a bit (4Gb of RAM, 2 x dual core 2.x Ghz CPUs). We don't
>> integrate
>> Cacti and Nagios, however. Nagios does both trending and alerts of
>> all
>> servers. Cacti does trending only of all network devices/ports.
>> Once I moved
>> Cacti to its own server, all was fine as far as load/latency went.
>
> That's useful to know Andrew, thanks.
>
> Regarding the trending of network devices - is there any reason why
> this can't be done by Nagios? I intend to install PNP4Nagios to take
> care of graphing anyway, but I think it would be nice to have all my
> monitored resources under the one system (for notifications and ease
> of administration).
>
> Is there some major advantage that Cacti provides when it comes to
> SNMP monitoring of network devices that cannot be achieved with Nagios
> and the various SNMP plug-ins available for it (e.g. like these ones
> http://nagios.manubulon.com) ?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ---
> ---
> ---
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
> Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list