NRPE and redundant calls to remote hosts.

Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 19:16:33 CET 2009


On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Hiren Patel <hir3npatel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marc Powell wrote:
>
> >
> > Passive checks with NSCA is pretty close, minus the 'if there is a
> > status change' part. You could build that logic into whatever wrapper
> > you are using to run the plugins on the remote host though. From the
> > perspective of the nagios host, passive checks are much better than
> > active checks.
> >
>

Thanks Hiren and Marc!


>
>
> and if you're processing performance data for graphing or the like, you
> want the results submitted even if the service is okay.
>
>
True. But for some services I'd like to know much quicker if something is
wrong than if it is just sending performance data back for graphs. The
passive approach seems perfect for this.

-- 
Rahul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20090209/a5f39329/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local
resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and
Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


More information about the Users mailing list