Rate of service checks

[Alex Dehaini]

Thanks man, it's in 2.9. I will set it now

Alex

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:02 AM, nagaraj raj <mr_nagas at yahoo.com> wrote:

> check the option
>
> # INTERVAL LENGTH
> # This is the seconds per unit interval as used in the
> # host/contact/service configuration files.  Setting this to 60 means
> # that each interval is one minute long (60 seconds).  Other settings
> # have not been tested much, so your mileage is likely to vary...
>
> interval_length=60
>  in nagios.cfg
>
> I am not sure if this works or there in 2.9
>
> but u can give a try   if this exists
>
> atleast this option is available in 3.0.6
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Alex Dehaini <alexdehaini at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Alex Dehaini <alexdehaini at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Rate of service checks
> > To: mr_nagas at yahoo.com
> > Cc: "nagios nagios" <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 3:20 PM
> > I am using nagios 2.9, can I set the normal_check_interval
> > below one minute?
> >
> > Lex
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:46 AM, nagaraj raj
> > <mr_nagas at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > if u are using nagios3.0.6
> > > it depends on the value that u configure in
> > template.cfg file  for the
> > > normal_check_interval paramter in service templates
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Alex Dehaini
> > <alexdehaini at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Alex Dehaini <alexdehaini at gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: [Nagios-users] Rate of service checks
> > > > To: "nagios nagios"
> > <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > > Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 2:18 PM
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > What setting or settings do I have to change to
> > make nagios
> > > > check a service
> > > > every 20 secs?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > --
> > > > Alex Dehaini
> > > > Developer
> > > > Site - www.alexdehaini.com
> > > > Email - alexdehaini at gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March
> > 24-25, 2009,
> > > > San Francisco, CA
> > > > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source:
> > Open
> > > > Sourcing the Enterprise
> > > > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs
> > with open
> > > > source participation
> > > > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee
> > with the
> > > > source code: SFAD
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H_______________________________________________
> > > > Nagios-users mailing list
> > > > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > > > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version
> > (-v) and
> > > > OS when reporting any issue.
> > > > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk
> > being sent
> > > > to /dev/null
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alex Dehaini
> > Developer
> > Site - www.alexdehaini.com
> > Email - alexdehaini at gmail.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
Alex Dehaini
Developer
Site - www.alexdehaini.com
Email - alexdehaini at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20090223/978b3a2d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null