Next check time bug?

[James Green]

Hi,

Shortly after I sent the email I checked our internal Nagios installation (as opposed to production) which is configured similarly but for different targets.

This exhibits the same problem. Each host & service check last performed shortly before 0300 this morning then the next check was scheduled for midnight tonight.

I do have one thing to add further: The timeperiod configured is 24x7, however ours have an exclude for backups (03:00-03:30). If this is significant I do not understand why the next check is not scheduled for just after 03:30. Each check is configured for 4 minute intervals.

Clearly I have checked via the web interface to confirm Nagios did indeed interpret my configuration correctly as far as I can tell.

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Gabriel Sosa [mailto:sosagabriel at gmail.com] 
Sent: 14 January 2009 13:49
To: James Green
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Next check time bug?

I have the exactly same problem this is my thread [1] but not not replies so far.



[1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4498aded0901091129l7c97e812h6deb91335a92700d%40mail.gmail.com

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 8:57 AM, James Green <james.green at mjog.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the web interface, the last check of every one of our 
> hosts and services was done just before 0300 this morning. When I 
> looked at them individually each had a Next check time of 2009-01-15 00:00:00.
>
> I am baffled.
>
> I have checked the log, it appears the last service checks were in 
> fact at 00:00:00 this morning, followed by "Auto-save of retention 
> data completed successfully." repeatedly.
>
> I changed the next check time on one of the services and indeed that 
> worked, logged the matter, and the next check time is now updating 
> normally.
>
> We are using 64 bit Ubuntu 8.10 with nagios 3.0.2-1ubuntu1.1. The 
> platform is Intel Core2 6600 with 2GB RAM.
>
> Does anyone have any pointers on this matter? Clearly this is 
> requiring me to come up with a "why" and how to prevent it happening again.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Green
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>



--
Los sabios buscan la sabiduría; los necios creen haberla encontrado.
Gabriel Sosa

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null