Question about using the NSCA addon

Matthew Tice mjtice at gmail.com
Fri Jan 16 16:12:18 CET 2009


Thanks for the responses.  The reason I didn't want to go the NSCA client
route is that I didn't want to have to deploy a binary to each node I'm
monitoring - really it just comes down to keeping things as simple as I can
(which you wouldn't be able to tell based upon what I'm requesting).

Anthony:  I started looking through the source and figured I was way in over
my head.  As much as I tried I couldn't really get a handle on what was
going on there . . .  I did manage to find a Perl script online that does
what I want though.

However, thanks to Mattias I think I'll try to implement his method (the
reason is that I have to integrate either 1. the Perl script into my
existing script, or 2. Mattias' shell script into my script - I think I'd
rather keep the script shorter).

Thanks for the ideas guys,

Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20090116/e2d59f59/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


More information about the Users mailing list