radius checks

[Jason Frisvold]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Holger Weiss wrote:
> What's the check_radius command line you're using and how does your
> radiusclient.conf look like?

With check_radius, I had used a configuration almost identical to what
you had (of course, addresses and secrets were different) ...  I've run
across an old message mentioning that running check_radius as root made
it work..

However, while I can get it to remotely contact the server if I run it
as root, I still get an Auth failed error.  I have, again, double
checked secrets and made sure that the nagios server is in the
clients.conf file properly.

And so now I have multiple radius clients that cannot seem to get the
secret correct, yet radtest works flawlessly.

Could this possibly be a 64-bit issue?  These servers are x86_64 RHEL5
servers..  Maybe that's a problem?  I'm grasping at this point...

- --
- ---------------------------
Jason Frisvold
Network Engineer
frisvolj at lafayette.edu
- ---------------------------
"What I cannot create, I do not understand"
   - Richard Feynman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJrqhvO80o6DJ8UvkRAh1vAJ99qcTP3YPOHHqG+InIKKbV5NoixQCdF08p
MApJtGnGghxwYcIrO75oDPI=
=UAGw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null