Monitoring Performance: Not sure what is good or bad

[Gabriel - IP Guys]

Below is a snapshot of monitoring performance as shown on the Tactical
Monitoring Overview Page

Monitoring Performance

Service Check Execution Time:		0.04 / 14.14 / 3.036 sec
Service Check Latency:			0.00 / 85.15 / 9.604 sec
Host Check Execution Time:		4.30 / 16.05 / 8.263 sec
Host Check Latency:			0.02 / 112.41 / 30.940 sec
# Active Host / Service Checks:	43 / 244
# Passive Host / Service Checks:	0  / 0

Now, I know that I'm not monitoring that many hosts, but I'm not sure
what 'good' performance is. My nagios server had an extremely high load
this morning, and the only service on that box, is nagios.

What type of performance should I reasonably expect from my monitoring
server?


The Puppet Apprentice   :- http://puppetnewbie.blogspot.com/
Follow me on twitter    :- http://twitter.com/mritguru
Puppet #tag on twitter  :- #puppet
IRC                     :- itguru ON irc.freenode.org (feel free to say
hi!)



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null