Nagios Core 3.2.3 host check retry interval

[Andreas Ericsson]

On 11/17/2010 03:55 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 22:52 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>> http://git.op5.org/git/?p=nagios.git;a=commitdiff;h=1149d275011d7c4d8631b44dbba30ebdb4d7e83f
>>
>> That one was in 3.2.2 too though. Could you try un-commenting the lines
>> mentioned there and see if that helps? I won't revert that patch, but it
> 
> Thanks for the help.  So I can make sure I've correctly done what you
> asked, this is what I did.  I removed lines 1415 and 1419 below from
> checks.c, then did a make clean, make all, make install, and restarted
> Nagios.
> 

That sounds about right, yes.

> 1414:/* Below removed 08/04/2010 EG -
> http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=128 */
> 1415-/*
> 1416-temp_service->state_type=HARD_STATE;
> 1417-temp_service->last_hard_state=temp_service->current_state;
> 1418-temp_service->current_attempt=1;
> 1419-*/
> 
> If that's right, I'll keep an eye on the frequency of our host alerts
> and see what happens.
> 

Neat. Thanks.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null