Remote command plugins

[Luis Miguel Silva]

Thank you very much!
I'll do a little research on it :o)

Thank you,
Luis Miguel Silva

On May 12, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Joerg Linge <pitchfork at ederdrom.de> wrote:

> Luis Miguel Silva schrieb:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I'm pretty new to Nagios and i was wondering how can i extract
>> information from remote hosts with Nagios?
>> i.e. get the remote hosts's cpu load, available disk, etc?
>> 
>> p.s. All my nodes have share ssh keys (so i can easily ssh into them);
> 
> you can use check_by_ssh which is part of nagios plugins package.
> you have to install the plugins you want to use (check_disk, check_load ...) on the remote side too.
> 
> Joerg  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
> What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
> Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
> to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null