check_nt - MEMORY USAGE - incorrect results
omar saddiki
omar.saddiki at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 09:55:20 CET 2013
this because in your server 2008 you will see that there is a virtual
memory activated, go to Computer proprieties and see in performences you
will have for exemple for " R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) –
12GB ram installed " 12GB of virtual memory.Finaly, Nagios take the some of
memories ( virual memory + RAM).
2013/1/9 Andrew Thompson <andrew at fulgent.co.uk>
> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> Using the supplied check_nt plugin to check Memory Usage on Windows
> servers.****
>
> ** **
>
> Some report correctly, others report a complete load of old tosh!!!****
>
> ** **
>
> I have tried 3 different versions of Windows OS, the version seems to make
> no odds.****
>
> Doesn’t matter if 32 or 64 bit either.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Some examples****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> MY primary domain controller – Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) – 8GB ram
> installed****
>
> ** **
>
> Output from the check appears correct:****
>
> Memory usage: total:8205.64 Mb - used: 2902.96 Mb (35%) - free: 5302.67 Mb
> (65%)****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Another 2008 R2 (x64) server box (has SQL installed on it) – 12GB ram
> installed****
>
> ** **
>
> Output thinks its got 24GB:****
>
> Memory usage: total:24573.16 Mb - used: 1796.71 Mb (7%) - free: 22776.45
> Mb (93%) ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> A Server 2003 Standard (x86) box (an internal test web server) – 512MB ram
> installed****
>
> ** **
>
> Output thinks its got over 1GB:****
>
> Memory usage: total:1257.50 Mb - used: 333.30 Mb (27%) - free: 924.20 Mb
> (73%)****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> A Server 2012 (x64) box (with HyperV installed) – 28GB ram installed****
>
> ** **
>
> Output thinks tis got 32GB:****
>
> Memory usage: total:32500.80 Mb - used: 16709.37 Mb (51%) - free: 15791.43
> Mb (49%)****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Anybody any ideas as to why check_nt is returning incorrect info. I know
> its incorrect but Nagios doesn’t so where exactly is it reading these
> values from?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks in advance for anybodies input.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
> and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
> 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
> SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
--
Cordialement,
Omar SADDIKI
Master Réseaux et Systèmes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20130110/af5d560d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list