<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> Hello to all.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> With some help from the group, and a lot of experimentation, I’ve had nagios-1.2-0.rhel3.dag up and running great on a CentOS 3.3 box. I’d like to upgrade to version 2.0b2, and have compiled an rpm from the tarball. I don’t want to sound like a wimp (although I probably do), but after all the work I’ve done, I don’t want to break my current installation. So my question are: Is there anything special I should do when upgrading? Will I have to do severe editing to my configuration files? Has anyone successfully (and easily) upgraded such as I’m planning on either CentOS os RHEL3?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> As a side question, if I may, I’ve never gotten the icons to show up in the status map. It’s probably been answered a thousand times, but I can’t seem to find the one that works for me. The icons live in /usr/share/nagios/images/logos/base on my system (I even created /usr/local/nagios/share/images/logos, as per the example in cgi.cfg. – no joy). In the cgi.cfg file, I’ve added lines like the following to show the icons: hostextinfo[norwell]=;/base/redhat.gif;/base/redhat.gif;/base/redhat.gif;CentOS 3.3;;; Is this correct? Do I have to do anything else?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Many thanks!<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Dimitri<o:p></o:p> </div> </body> </html>