<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <TITLE>Passive service freshness check syntax</TITLE> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV dir=ltr align=left>As a follow, up, setting it as below caused the freshness checks to start working.</DIV> <DIV dir=ltr align=left> </DIV> <DIV dir=ltr align=left>However, in the GUI, they are listed as disabled problems, not unhandled problems. Which is an issue. When a freshness check trigger a critical, I want it to be an unhandled problem, not a disabled one. (Which is probably why I was using the original syntax.)</DIV> <DIV dir=ltr align=left> </DIV> <DIV dir=ltr align=left>So I guess the follow up is did anything change between 1.x and 2.x that would have causes the 1st syntax to stop working? Will check_period now block freshess triggered active checks?</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left> <HR tabIndex=-1> From: Andrew Laden [mailto:Andrew.Laden@tudor.com] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 11:06 AM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] Passive service freshness check syntax </DIV> <DIV></DIV> Did the methodology for passive service freshness checks change at some point. I have my config set up as Check_period none passive_checks_enabled 1 Active_checks_enabled 1 Which if I recall was to allow active checks to be forced, as the freshness check would do, not not run on a regualar basis. Yet from the recent docs, it looks like the proper method should be. Check_period 24x7 Passive_checks_enabled 1 Active_checks_enabled 0 Which is it? I am trying to debug why freshness checking is no longer working. (2.0b4 and 2.0b6) -Andrew </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>