SNMP WARNING
Kyle Tucker
kylet at panix.com
Wed Mar 22 11:29:48 CET 2006
> > Am I missing something fundamental about this command ?
>
> It appears that you missed the 'min:max' vs. 'max:min' thing on the ranges,
> but 1) that's a common oversight, and 2) it doesn't appear to be the real
> reason you're getting nothing but warnings.
James, thanks for all this detailed explanation on check_snmp. I am
using the plugin extensively, but I have a fundamental problem with
it being designed to give an OK if checks for warning and critical
ranges and are within that range. This has for me - and must for
others - been the source of confusion and need for some brain strain.
What do you suppose was the thinking with this approach? The man page
says it best.
-w, --warning=INTEGER_RANGE(s)
Range(s) which will not result in a WARNING status
Why not specify the *warning* range using the *warning* option that
*WILL* produce a *warning*? It just seems all backwards.
--
- Kyle
---------------------------------------------
kylet at panix.com http://www.panix.com/~kylet
---------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
More information about the Users
mailing list