service with only passive checks.

[Marc Powell]

In your service definition --

active_checks_enabled           0       ; Active service checks are
disabled
passive_checks_enabled          1       ; Passive service checks are
enabled/accepted

I think you still have to define a check_command but it'll never get
executed.


--
Marc


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Hebrank [mailto:mhh at apk.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:21 AM
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> Ok. Sort of a newbie, but I did go through the FAQ and docs and can't
seem
> to find a way to do this. If I am an idiot and it's documented, or
> thinking wrong, please yell at me.
> 
> I want to define services with no real check_command, only a passive
> check. I would like it to simply assume that it's in the last state
sent
> in via passive check. Is that at all possible?
> 
> ** Martin
> 
> --
> Martin Hebrank. Systems Administrator/Postmaster
> APK.net, Cleveland, OH.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
> Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null