Nagios e-mail reports

[Bobby]

Well, this might have been another one of  that mailer-type problem, meaning not really caused by Nagios itself...
Might as well take a look at your mailer-program (sendmail, postfix...etc)  configs...   

Look at some of those timers there and probably youll got some ideas from it...

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jerad Riggin 
  To: Jeremy C. Reed 
  Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios e-mail reports


  Now that I look at it, it looks like the down e-mails that didn't have corresponding recovery e-mails were delayed for some reason (by about 15 minutes).  So perhaps I'm just reading this out of order.  I have on clue why that would happen. 


  On 7/24/07, Jeremy C. Reed <reed at reedmedia.net> wrote: 
    On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Jerad Riggin wrote:

    > Last night I got a few warning/critical errors with a few recovery e-mails. 
    > However towards this morning I received 2 critical alerts and even though
    > they recovered I didn't receive a recovery e-mail.  Any ideas?

    What do your nagios logs say about it?

    Jeremy C. Reed 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20070725/7ba4d1f0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null